Why are RB-trees used to implement std::set?
Mon May 11 16:41:00 GMT 2015
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Brian Budge <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Break binary compatibility? What kind of guarantees are there? I'm
>> not advocating a change in data structures, but it doesn't seem like
>> there are any promises beyond API conformance, are there?
> Imagine you write a library and you compile and distribute the
> binaries. Someone else builds against those. If std::set is used in
> your API, and they have a different version of libstdc++, do you still
> want the library and the binary to be compatible, even across
> different versions of libstdc++?
Playing devil's advocate, I want interface compatibility. That said, I
understand the motivation behind it; it's a good reason, without going
through the proof.
More information about the Gcc-help