Is C++11 to be default for GCC 4.9?

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 26 January 2014 16:17, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> I can definitely sympathise with reading the message the other way though.
> If that's the only output you see, the natural assumption is that the
> "enabled by default" applies to the thing just before it.
>
> Any objections to changing it to "this warning is enabled by default"
> or "warning enabled by default"?  Or is that too verbose?

The former seems far too verbose to me, I could live with the latter
(even though it's only a few characters shorter!)