ivopts-caused "unrecognized insn"
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Wed Sep 26 05:53:00 GMT 2012
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Cynbe ru Taren
<cynbe-kw-gcchelp.bbf6e8@cynbe.us> wrote:
>
> (define_insn "addsi3"
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
> (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "%r,r")
> (match_operand:SI 2 "arith_operand" "r,I")))]
> ""
> "add%i2\\t%0, %1, %z2"
> [(set_attr "type" "alu")])
> Searching on the above I find a similar report back in 2009 to which
> Ian Lance Taylor suggested using a define_expand, but according to the
> manual define_expand is useful only when named, for generating rtx,
> whereas my (initial) problem is matching rtx, rather than generating
> it, if I understand correctly.
No, addsi3 is a named pattern and you could and should use define_expand.
Ian
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list