Build completed GCJ, anyone?

[Kevin P. Fleming]

On 04/16/2012 03:58 AM, Me Myself and I wrote:
>
> I'm just politely asking, but why not?  It would solve my problems.

Why not? There is no way to definitively answer why something does *not* 
exist. Why aren't we all commuting to the moon? Why hasn't cancer been 
cured?

The reason that he answered 'No' is because you've asked this same 
(albeit poorly formed) question at least six times over the past few 
months on this mailing list, and nobody has answered affirmatively. If 
anyone on this list had a pre-built compiler to offer you, they would 
likely have done so by now. Granted, the list does gain new subscribers 
and it's possible one of them might have what you are looking for, but 
given how rarely GCJ on Windows is used (it appears), that seems unlikely.

>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:10:59 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Build completed GCJ, anyone?
>> From: jwakely.gcc@gmail.com
>> To: stargate7thsymbol@live.co.uk
>> CC: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; java@gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> On 16 April 2012 07:03, Me Myself and I wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there anyone out there in cygwin land, GNU land or GCJ land who can give me a URL
>>>
>>> address for a GCJ that will run on windows (default or cygwin mode) that has been been completedly
>>>
>>> and operates successfully?  I simply can't succeed in building a GCJ, that compiles classes or windows binaries,
>>>
>>> supports Java 1.6 syntax, that finishes being built (successfully), and that does the job?
>>>
>>> ?
>>
>> No.
>   		 	   		


-- 
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@digium.com | SIP: kpfleming@digium.com | Skype: kpfleming
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org