Fwd: Assembler code with useless instructions
Andrew Haley
aph@redhat.com
Thu May 19 19:03:00 GMT 2011
On 05/19/2011 06:47 PM, Diego Caballero wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I get 10% lower performance due to an assemble instruction that seems
> to be useless.
> I have a lot of blocks like the following (exactly the same) in my code:
>
> callq 400a50 <expf@plt>
> movaps %xmm0,%xmm4
> movss (%r15),%xmm0
> movss %xmm4,0x40(%rsp)
> callq 400a50 <expf@plt>
> ...
>
> and at the end of them:
>
> movss 0x40(%rsp),%xmm4
>
> %xmm4 is not read in the middle, so I don't understand why gcc generates
> the second instruction, instead of something like that:
>
> movss %xmm0,0x40(%rsp)
> movss (%r15),%xmm0
> callq 400a50 <expf@plt>
> ...
> movss 0x40(%rsp),%xmm4
>
> Thank you in advance.
Hi Diego,
Can you make a small test case for us to try? It should be the smallest
program that demonstrates the problem.
Andrew.
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list