Floating point performance issue
Vincent Lefevre
vincent+gcc@vinc17.org
Tue Dec 20 12:00:00 GMT 2011
On 2011-12-20 12:16:34 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Now, the test program is faster where the values are *closer* to 0.
> This contradicts what you say about subnormals.
Actually, after thinking a bit more about it, there are also more
operations on the subnormals in the case 0.9, so that the subnormals
could also be a problem, and indeed:
ypig:~> time ./a.out 0.9999999
./a.out 0.9999999 0.10s user 0.00s system 92% cpu 0.108 total
ypig:~> time ./a.out 0.9
./a.out 0.9 2.93s user 0.00s system 98% cpu 2.987 total
ypig:~> time ./a.out 0.1
./a.out 0.1 0.10s user 0.00s system 86% cpu 0.116 total
The fact that only the second case is slower tends to indicate that
the problem is the subnormals (whether they are implemented in
software and in hardware).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list