Build and Check Problems with gcc 4.5.1: Bugs to Be Reported?
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Fri Aug 13 15:38:00 GMT 2010
Tom Browder <tom.browder@gmail.com> writes:
> I did get some "FAIL:" results but, according to some gcc
> instructions, they are not too significant. However, I have repeated
> them here:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O0 line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O0 line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O1 line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O1 line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O2 line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer line 24 sizeof
> (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -g line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -O3 -g line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Os line 17 sizeof (a) == 6
> FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c -Os line 24 sizeof (a) == 17 * sizeof (short)
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail31-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test
> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
> FAIL: abi_check
>
> My concerns are two:
>
> 1. Should I be worried about the check results?
>
> 2. Should I file a bug report for any or all of these problems?
One approach is to look at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/ to see
if the automated testers see similar errors for your target. If they
do, then there is nothing to worry about.
The libmudflap tests are a little flaky in my experience. I'm not sure
about the guality or abi_check test failure, though.
Ian
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list