Relocation problem with MIPS kernel modules
Ralf Baechle
ralf@linux-mips.org
Mon Aug 3 19:14:00 GMT 2009
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:44:54AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>>> R_MIPS_HI16 relocations to be followed by a R_MIPS_LO16 symbol. All
>>> relocations of this sequence must use the same symbol, of course. This is
>>> a very old extension; I think it predates the Linux/MIPS port.
>>
>> Perhaps a foolish question, but is this documented anywhere?
>
> What more documentation do you need? It's obvious if you read
> bfd/elf{32,64,xx}-mips.c :-).
David ist (unforutunately ...) right. I don't think this is documented
anywhere. I also only learned it from reading the binutils sources.
Ralf
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list