Pointless use of restrict
Marcus Clyne
maccaday@gmail.com
Mon Aug 17 09:52:00 GMT 2009
Hi,
Am I right in saying that defining a function like
func_name (my_type_t * __restrict);
is pointless, because there are no other pointers that the pointer could
overlap with?
Can anyone explain what GCC does differently for the two following
definitions:
func1 (my_type_t * __restrict, my_type_t *__restrict);
AND
func2 (my_type_t *, my_type_t *);
?
Thanks,
Marcus.
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list