32 x 32 -> 64 bit widening multiply on x86_64
Ian Lance Taylor
Tue Nov 11 15:48:00 GMT 2008
"Mark Dickinson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> If I'm not mistaken, that imulq is a 64 x 64 -> 64 bit multiply; this
> seems inefficient, when a 32 x 32 -> 64 bit multiply ought to be
> good enough. Is there a good reason for having a 64-bit multiply
> here? Or is gcc just not in a good position to make this kind
> of optimization?
The problem with the 32 x 32 -> 64 bit widening multiply in 64-bit
mode is that it generates the result as two separate 32-bit values in
different registers. In order to use the 64-bit value, gcc would have
to generate code to reassemble the two registers into one. On balance
it's normally preferable to simply use the 64 x 64 -> 64 multiply.
More information about the Gcc-help