gcc -o Foo Foo.java Doesn't Produce Foo

[Andrew Haley]

Eus wrote:
> Hi Ho!
> 
> --- On Thu, 7/17/08, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> First, make sure you can create a dynamically linked
>> executable.
>> If that doesn't work either, tell us.
> 
> Yes, Foo was produced and could be executed successfully if it was compiled and dynamically linked with the following command:
> 
> gcj -o Foo Foo.java --main=Foo
> 
> However, when I tried all of the steps given on the wiki once again (this time by copying and pasting), Foo was produced.
> 
> Looking at my Bash history, it turned out that I made a mistake when typing the last step:
> $ gcc -o Foo ... -Wl,-non_hsared ...
> 
> Because of this, Foo was not produced.
> 
> Is there a switch that can force GCC to produce an error message for this kind of mis-typed word?

No.  All arguments beginning with -Wl, are passed to the linker.

Andrew.