unknown directives

[Ian Lance Taylor]

"Bill McEnaney" <bill@rkirkpat.net> writes:

> Here are some messages that my Sun workstation printed when it tried to
> build gcc-4.2.3.  If "test" is an sh command, do I need a new version of
> sh?   What's wrong?  Thanks a lot.

It's a portability bug.  The script was using the nonportable -ef
option to test.  This has been fixed in gcc 4.3.

The fix seems to be to change this line in
libjava/classpath/lib/gen-classlist.sh.in:

if test ! "${top_builddir}" -ef "@top_srcdir@"; then

to this:

abs_top_builddir=`cd "${top_builddir}"; pwd`
abs_top_srcdir=`cd "@top_srcdir@"; pwd`
if test "$abs_top_builddir" != "$abs_top_srcdir"; then

Ian