OT Rant on why C++ Sucks (Was Re: strict aliasing: how to swap pointers)
Wed Apr 30 03:03:00 GMT 2008
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:28:33 -0400
Robert William Fuller <email@example.com> wrote:
> Rupert Wood wrote:
> > Evan Jones wrote:
> >> I have a function to swap any two pointers (assuming that
> >> sizeof(void*) == sizeof(T*)). I would like to use it without
> >> violating strict aliasing rules.
> > I don't know how to fight aliasing rules but as another approach
> > you could template the function instead, i.e.
> > template<typename T> T* exchange(T** ptr, T* next);
> > exchange<int>(&a, &v2);
> > since you're using C++ here.
> </begin rant>
> What a fabulous idea for a programming language! Why not instantiate
> code for every subtle variation of a type? Then, create a giant
> library called STL for that very purpose. Watch your executables
> grow to multiple megabytes in size guaranteeing they won't fit into
> the cache of any processor. What better way to bring your quad-core
> processor to its knees. All hail the grand design of C++!
> Ah, thank you :-) I feel better now. That was cathartic.
> </end rant>
Clearly we just need bigger processor caches. Those boys down in
hardware just been slacking. Not keeping up with the latest
developments in software!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gcc-help