static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration

[Aseem Rastogi]

In that case, have you made sure that foo is declared before it is used ?

And can you attach some code snippe.

-Aseem.

Dhiraj.Nilange@iflexsolutions.com wrote:

>Hi Aseem,
>
>This is a pure 'C' code. So it doesn't have any class. Here foo is one
>global function.
>
>Basically this is a typical C file where many functions are 
>defined (foo is used by some other functions in the same C file). Being
>outside any scope they are global. There is no main function defined.
>
>
>Thanks,
>-Dhiraj
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On
>Behalf Of Aseem Rastogi
>Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 4:49 PM
>To: Dhiraj Nilange-DD
>Cc: gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration
>
>I doubt the way you are using foo () in your code. I hope you are aware 
>that static functions should be used by prefixing them with class name. 
>For ex. if class name is A and function is foo, you should write A::foo
>().
>
>If you can show some code, it would be better.
>
>-Aseem.
>
>Dhiraj.Nilange@iflexsolutions.com wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>During gcc compilation of  C code I am getting these strange errors
>>(compile time):-
>>
>>
>>error: static declaration of foo follows non-static declaration
>>
>>error: previous implicit declaration of foo was here
>>
>>
>>foo is some function here. These errors are surprising, because there
>>
>is
>
>>only one definition of the function foo. Moreover this code perflectly
>>gets compiled using IBM's xlr_c and HP's aCC. So I guess this is gcc
>>specific issue. Please help!
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Dhiraj
>>
>>
>
>
>
>