Fwd: error in variable dereferencing

[Andrew Haley]

Thibaud GUERIN writes:
 > On 4/22/06, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote:
 > > Well, we've established that whetever is wrong, it's not the code gcc
 > > generates for this routine.  It's correct, as you can see.
 > >
 > >  > The only debug ways usable in the code right now are some things like :
 > >  > i = (long)(fmt);
 > >  > __asm__ volatile ("mov %0, %%eax\n":: "m"(i));
 > >  > __asm__ volatile ("l1: jmp l1");
 > >  >
 > >  > which are really dirty i agree...
 > >
 > > Thay're also wrong, becasue they don't clobber eax.
 > 
 > If you have any way to do it (or check with cleaner ways) i'm
 > listening .... it'll be helpfull....

Just put "eax" in the clobber list of the asm.  But really, we've gone
as far down the read as we can with this: the gcc code you produced is
correct.  Time to look elsewhere.

Andrew.