copy ctor not called

Eljay Love-Jensen eljay@adobe.com
Thu Jul 7 12:02:00 GMT 2005


Hi Jeroen,

>According to your statement they are wrong.

Please re-read my statement.  My statement does not contradict what you cited from C++ Primer.

What is being elided is the assignment operator, not the copy constructor.  The copy constructor is still being used for initialization.

Sincerely,
--Eljay



More information about the Gcc-help mailing list