Function typedefs have any use?

Kevin P. Fleming
Sun Feb 6 11:58:00 GMT 2005

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
"Kevin P. Fleming" <> writes:

| Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:
| > But the syntax of C doesn't have the language construct of "here's a
| > label (identifier), here's the type of that label, and here's it's
| > body".

You mean like this:

      typedef int F(int);
      F f;      /* function "f" taking an int and returning an int. */
Well, I was wrong... it does not work. This specific example works, but 
only because the default return type for a function is "int".

If you try this with a typedef-ed function returning anything but int, 
you'll get errors from the compiler about incompatible definitions of 
the function.

So, that leaves me back at my original quandary: I can create a typedef 
of a function type, and I can use that typedef to declare function 
pointers to hold addresses of compatible functions, but I can't use the 
typedef to actually _declare_ those compatible functions (I have to 
write the prototype of the function to match the typedef, and if I don't 
do it correctly then any errors that the compiler finds will be at 
places where the function's address is assigned to a function pointer, 
not at the function definition itself). Bummer.

More information about the Gcc-help mailing list