[OT] Prevent linker from unnecessary symbol resolution
Srikanth Madani
srikanth.madani@vodafone.com
Tue May 11 19:41:00 GMT 2004
Thanks for the response Ian.
So, the conclusion is that my binary is stuck with unnecessary relocatable
code (of a function func3() which main() doesn't call).
Of course, I don't call func2() either, but I can accept that - as it is
defined within an object file which I use (fun1.o)
My interest in all this is to remove unused functions, and thus reduce the
size of my final binary.
I did find another thread on this list which dealt with removing dead code.
Here's the Google cache :
http://66.102.11.104/search?q=cache:5y73E-67cZAJ:gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/200
3-08/msg00128.html++site:gcc.gnu.org+removing+dead+code&hl=en
I'm not sure I can do this under Solaris though - I will post an update if I
manage it.
Best regards,
Srikanth Madani
ps: Here's the entire scenario - if someone wishes to recreate it.
[181]> \ls *.c
fun1.c fun2.c hello.c
[182]> cat fun1.c
void func1() {
printf("\nIn function func1()\n");
}
void func2() {
func3();
}
[183]> cat fun2.c
void func3() {
printf("\nIn function func3()\n");
}
[184]> cat hello.c
void main() {
func1();
}
[185]> cc hello.c fun1.c
hello.c:
fun1.c:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
func3 fun1.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to a.out
And if I use fun2.c as well - then all goes well.
[186]> cc hello.c fun1.c fun2.c
hello.c:
fun1.c:
fun2.c:
[187]> \ls a.out
a.out
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list