gcc 3.3: long long bug?

[A.R. Ashok Kumar]

Hi,

On 7 Apr 2003, Anders [ISO-8859-1] Ådland wrote:

> I don't know anything about C standards, but why do we have to add the
> 'LL' suffix? Is it giving any additional information to the compiler?

  If you didn't specify 'L' or 'LL' suffix, then gcc will consider it
  as "integer" type (4 bytes). 

-AshokA-

> On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 15:07, A.R. Ashok Kumar wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > |>    You can check the size of "long long" type in your system, by printing
> > > |>    sizeof(long long). 
> > > 
> > > On my system sizeof(long) is 8.
> > 
> >   Since 8 bytes are too small to hold 35-bit numbers, the error occurred.
> > 
> >   Please use 'LL' suffix, to solve the problem.
> > 
> >    i.e  const long long n = 34359738368LL;
> > 
> > - AshokA -
> > 
> 
>