Missing constructor call...

[Gokhan Kisacikoglu]

> If I have a class representing iterators, then under
> certain circumstances:

Is there anyway you can describe a bit more these certain circumstances
to determine whether this is really a bug in your code or in the gcc? It
is really suspicious that this is working in some instances and not in
others...

Thanks,
Gokhan


> 
>   const C::const_iterator start = my_list.begin();
>   C::const_iterator iter = start;
> 
> will result in no constructor being called for iter,
> Whereas:
> 
>   const C::const_iterator start = my_list.begin();
>   C::const_iterator iter;
>   iter = start;
> 
> results in the correct code. Also:
> 
>   const C::const_iterator start = my_list.begin();
>   C::const_iterator iter(start);
>