RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests?
David Presberg
David.Presberg@conexant.com
Tue May 30 08:59:00 GMT 2000
Gerald --
Hmmm. Note the following (?) randomness:
D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 24May 08:29 941/31837
"gcc Digest 24 May 2000 08:29:36 -0000 Issue 674"
T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 25May 12:03 1469/52200
"gcc Digest 25 May 2000 12:03:47 -0000 Issue 675"
T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 26May 10:52 1269/45209
"gcc Digest 26 May 2000 10:52:18 -0000 Issue 676"
T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 27May 18:12 1193/40599
"gcc Digest 27 May 2000 18:12:10 -0000 Issue 677"
D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 28May 14:16 1126/35666
"gcc Digest 28 May 2000 14:16:49 -0000 Issue 678"
D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 29May 15:20 1056/36941
"gcc Digest 29 May 2000 15:20:23 -0000 Issue 679"
T* gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 30May 15:30 1450/55179
"gcc Digest 30 May 2000 15:30:32 -0000 Issue 680"
where:
"D" == (proper digest). "T" == "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii".
but:
"T*" == "Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
Boundary="0__=882568EF005567FF8f9e8a93df938690918c882568EF005567FF".
which latter is still not a proper digest-form email.
And only the proper digests have the extra header-lines that explain
about getting off the list, etc.
I didn't see any mentions of this digest-and-no-digest situation in any
of the postings to "gcc" since you answered my first note on 26 May.
-- Pres
- David L. Presberg, Software Engineer/Tools
- Conexant Systems/Maker Inc., 8 Technology Drive
- Westborough, MA 01581-1756, USA Phone: (508) 621-0680
- David.Presberg@conexant.com Nickname: Pres Fax: (508) 621-0605
- *** NOTE THAT ADDRESS, PHONES, AND EMAIL CHANGED, MARCH 2000 ***
More information about the Gcc-help
mailing list