[gcc r14-12702] c++: substituting fn parm redeclared with dep alias tmpl [PR120224]
Patrick Palka
ppalka@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Jun 27 20:08:51 GMT 2026
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c401ff8c4304eee1dc80adf0573a052a632214a3
commit r14-12702-gc401ff8c4304eee1dc80adf0573a052a632214a3
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jun 5 11:07:25 2025 -0400
c++: substituting fn parm redeclared with dep alias tmpl [PR120224]
Here we declare f twice, the second time around using a dependent
alias template. Due to alias template transparency these are logically
the same overload. But now the function type of f (produced from the
first declaration) diverges from the type of its formal parameter
(produced from the subsequent redefinition) in that substituting T=int
succeeds for the function type but not for the formal parameter type.
This eventually causes us to produce an undiagnosed error_mark_node in
the AST of the function call, leading to failure of the sanity check
check added in r14-6343-g0c018a74eb1aff.
Before r14-6343 we would still go on to reject the testcase later at
instantiation time, from regenerate_decl_from_template, making this a
regression.
To fix this, it seems we just need to propagate error_mark_node upon
substitution failure into the type of a PARM_DECL.
PR c++/120224
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (tsubst_function_decl): Return error_mark_node if
substituting into the formal parameter list failed.
(tsubst_decl) <case PARM_DECL>: Return error_mark_node
upon TREE_TYPE substitution failure, when in a SFINAE
context. Return error_mark_node upon DECL_CHAIN substitution
failure.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-80.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 51e93aadc94940e2da854cf1321a7ab1aebf8d1a)
Diff:
---
gcc/cp/pt.cc | 14 ++++++++++++--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-80.C | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 3ba1fb944b34..733ce975500c 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -14719,6 +14719,8 @@ tsubst_function_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain,
if (closure && DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (t))
parms = DECL_CHAIN (parms);
parms = tsubst (parms, args, complain, t);
+ if (parms == error_mark_node)
+ return error_mark_node;
for (tree parm = parms; parm; parm = DECL_CHAIN (parm))
DECL_CONTEXT (parm) = r;
if (closure && DECL_IOBJ_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (t))
@@ -15294,6 +15296,9 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain,
/* We're dealing with a normal parameter. */
type = tsubst (TREE_TYPE (t), args, complain, in_decl);
+ if (type == error_mark_node && !(complain & tf_error))
+ RETURN (error_mark_node);
+
type = type_decays_to (type);
TREE_TYPE (r) = type;
cp_apply_type_quals_to_decl (cp_type_quals (type), r);
@@ -15331,8 +15336,13 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t complain,
/* If cp_unevaluated_operand is set, we're just looking for a
single dummy parameter, so don't keep going. */
if (DECL_CHAIN (t) && !cp_unevaluated_operand)
- DECL_CHAIN (r) = tsubst (DECL_CHAIN (t), args,
- complain, DECL_CHAIN (t));
+ {
+ tree chain = tsubst (DECL_CHAIN (t), args,
+ complain, DECL_CHAIN (t));
+ if (chain == error_mark_node)
+ RETURN (error_mark_node);
+ DECL_CHAIN (r) = chain;
+ }
/* FIRST_R contains the start of the chain we've built. */
r = first_r;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-80.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-80.C
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c0eadc967c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-80.C
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// PR c++/120224
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<class> using void_t = void;
+
+template<class T>
+void f(void*); // #1
+
+template<class T>
+void f(void_t<typename T::type>*) { } // { dg-error "not a class" } defn of #1
+
+template<class T>
+void g(int, void*); // #2
+
+template<class T>
+void g(int, void_t<typename T::type>*) { } // { dg-error "not a class" } defn of #2
+
+int main() {
+ f<int>(0); // { dg-error "no match" }
+ g<int>(0, 0); // { dg-error "no match" }
+}
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list