[gcc r16-3843] target.def: Properly mark up __cxa_atexit as code

[Gerald Pfeifer]

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c23566d94e63243ee259290926c6dd4073a3893

commit r16-3843-g8c23566d94e63243ee259290926c6dd4073a3893
Author: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Date:   Sun Sep 14 01:06:51 2025 +0200

    target.def: Properly mark up __cxa_atexit as code
    
    gcc:
            * target.def (dtors_from_cxa_atexit): Properly mark up
            __cxa_atexit as code.
            * doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.

Diff:
---
 gcc/doc/tm.texi | 7 ++++---
 gcc/target.def  | 7 ++++---
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/tm.texi b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
index 37642680f423..b80e6846dd7c 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/tm.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/tm.texi
@@ -9579,9 +9579,10 @@ It is false if we must use @command{collect2}.
 
 @deftypevr {Target Hook} bool TARGET_DTORS_FROM_CXA_ATEXIT
 This value is true if the target wants destructors to be queued to be
-run from __cxa_atexit.  If this is the case then, for each priority level,
-a new constructor will be entered that registers the destructors for that
-level with __cxa_atexit (and there will be no destructors emitted).
+run from @code{__cxa_atexit}.  If this is the case then, for each
+priority level, a new constructor will be entered that registers the
+destructors for that level with @code{__cxa_atexit} (and there will be
+no destructors emitted).
 It is false the method implied by @code{have_ctors_dtors} is used.
 @end deftypevr
 
diff --git a/gcc/target.def b/gcc/target.def
index 8e491d838642..d4fd3b46a7d3 100644
--- a/gcc/target.def
+++ b/gcc/target.def
@@ -7238,9 +7238,10 @@ It is false if we must use @command{collect2}.",
 DEFHOOKPOD
 (dtors_from_cxa_atexit,
  "This value is true if the target wants destructors to be queued to be\n\
-run from __cxa_atexit.  If this is the case then, for each priority level,\n\
-a new constructor will be entered that registers the destructors for that\n\
-level with __cxa_atexit (and there will be no destructors emitted).\n\
+run from @code{__cxa_atexit}.  If this is the case then, for each\n\
+priority level, a new constructor will be entered that registers the\n\
+destructors for that level with @code{__cxa_atexit} (and there will be\n\
+no destructors emitted).\n\
 It is false the method implied by @code{have_ctors_dtors} is used.",
  bool, false)