[gcc(refs/users/meissner/heads/work221-sha)] PR target/117251: Improve vector xor to vector nor fusion
Michael Meissner
meissner@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Sep 8 19:56:56 GMT 2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd9c4016dd7f6c0080f4a6ba53de760a063be668
commit fd9c4016dd7f6c0080f4a6ba53de760a063be668
Author: Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon Sep 8 15:34:40 2025 -0400
PR target/117251: Improve vector xor to vector nor fusion
See the following post for a complete explanation of what the patches
for PR target/117251:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-June/686474.html
This is patch #27 of 45 to generate the 'XXEVAL' instruction on power10
and power11 instead of using the Altivec 'VXOR' instruction feeding
into 'VNOR'. The 'XXEVAL' instruction can use all 64 vector registers,
instead of the 32 registers that traditional Altivec vector
instructions use. By allowing all of the vector registers to be used,
it reduces the amount of spilling that a large benchmark generated.
Currently the following code:
vector int a, b, c, d;
a = ~ ((c ^ d) | b);
Generates:
vxor t,c,d
vnor a,t,b
Now in addition with this patch, if the arguments or result is
allocated to a traditional FPR register, the GCC compiler will now
generate the following code instead of adding vector move instructions:
xxeval a,b,c,144
Since fusion using 2 Altivec instructions is slightly faster than using
the 'XXEVAL' instruction we prefer to generate the Altivec instructions
if we can. In addition, because 'XXEVAL' is a prefixed instruction, it
possibly might generate an extra NOP instruction to align the 'XXEVAL'
instruction.
I have tested these patches on both big endian and little endian
PowerPC servers, with no regressions. Can I check these patchs into
the trunk?
2025-09-08 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/
PR target/117251
* config/rs6000/fusion.md: Regenerate.
* config/rs6000/genfusion.pl (gen_logical_addsubf): Add support
to generate vector xor => nor fusion if XXEVAL is supported.
Diff:
---
gcc/config/rs6000/fusion.md | 15 +++++++++------
gcc/config/rs6000/genfusion.pl | 1 +
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/fusion.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/fusion.md
index 66d98f4537e1..e5ea37c567d6 100644
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/fusion.md
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/fusion.md
@@ -2618,20 +2618,23 @@
;; logical-logical fusion pattern generated by gen_logical_addsubf
;; vector vxor -> vnor
(define_insn "*fuse_vxor_vnor"
- [(set (match_operand:VM 3 "altivec_register_operand" "=&0,&1,&v,v")
- (and:VM (not:VM (xor:VM (match_operand:VM 0 "altivec_register_operand" "v,v,v,v")
- (match_operand:VM 1 "altivec_register_operand" "v,v,v,v")))
- (not:VM (match_operand:VM 2 "altivec_register_operand" "v,v,v,v"))))
- (clobber (match_scratch:VM 4 "=X,X,X,&v"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:VM 3 "vector_fusion_operand" "=&0,&1,&v,wa,v")
+ (and:VM (not:VM (xor:VM (match_operand:VM 0 "vector_fusion_operand" "v,v,v,wa,v")
+ (match_operand:VM 1 "vector_fusion_operand" "v,v,v,wa,v")))
+ (not:VM (match_operand:VM 2 "vector_fusion_operand" "v,v,v,wa,v"))))
+ (clobber (match_scratch:VM 4 "=X,X,X,X,&v"))]
"(TARGET_P10_FUSION)"
"@
vxor %3,%1,%0\;vnor %3,%3,%2
vxor %3,%1,%0\;vnor %3,%3,%2
vxor %3,%1,%0\;vnor %3,%3,%2
+ xxeval %x3,%x2,%x1,%x0,144
vxor %4,%1,%0\;vnor %3,%4,%2"
[(set_attr "type" "fused_vector")
(set_attr "cost" "6")
- (set_attr "length" "8")])
+ (set_attr "length" "8")
+ (set_attr "prefixed" "*,*,*,yes,*")
+ (set_attr "isa" "*,*,*,xxeval,*")])
;; logical-logical fusion pattern generated by gen_logical_addsubf
;; vector vand -> vor
diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/genfusion.pl b/gcc/config/rs6000/genfusion.pl
index 98b56b788f03..d713d10a1dbc 100755
--- a/gcc/config/rs6000/genfusion.pl
+++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/genfusion.pl
@@ -241,6 +241,7 @@ sub gen_logical_addsubf
"vor_vnor" => 128,
"vnor_vxor" => 135,
"vnor_vor" => 143,
+ "vxor_vnor" => 144,
);
KIND: foreach $kind ('scalar','vector') {
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list