[gcc r14-6805] symtab-thunks: Use aggregate_value_p even on is_gimple_reg_type returns [PR112941]
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Dec 22 11:30:33 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a6aa1927597d821a85bc3d1fd7682256c25b548
commit r14-6805-g0a6aa1927597d821a85bc3d1fd7682256c25b548
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Dec 22 12:28:54 2023 +0100
symtab-thunks: Use aggregate_value_p even on is_gimple_reg_type returns [PR112941]
Large/huge _BitInt types are returned in memory and the bitint lowering
pass right now relies on that.
The gimplification etc. use aggregate_value_p to see if it should be
returned in memory or not and use
<retval> = _123;
return <retval>;
rather than
return _123;
But expand_thunk used e.g. by IPA-ICF was performing an optimization,
assuming is_gimple_reg_type is always passed in registers and not calling
aggregate_value_p in that case. The following patch changes it to match
what the gimplification etc. are doing.
2023-12-22 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/112941
* symtab-thunks.cc (expand_thunk): Check aggregate_value_p regardless
of whether is_gimple_reg_type (restype) or not.
* gcc.dg/bitint-60.c: New test.
Diff:
---
gcc/symtab-thunks.cc | 18 ++++++------------
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/symtab-thunks.cc b/gcc/symtab-thunks.cc
index 23ead0d2138..0e5fc4f90d2 100644
--- a/gcc/symtab-thunks.cc
+++ b/gcc/symtab-thunks.cc
@@ -479,21 +479,15 @@ expand_thunk (cgraph_node *node, bool output_asm_thunks,
resdecl,
build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (resdecl), 0));
}
- else if (!is_gimple_reg_type (restype))
+ else if (aggregate_value_p (resdecl, TREE_TYPE (thunk_fndecl)))
{
- if (aggregate_value_p (resdecl, TREE_TYPE (thunk_fndecl)))
+ restmp = resdecl;
+
+ if (VAR_P (restmp))
{
- restmp = resdecl;
-
- if (VAR_P (restmp))
- {
- add_local_decl (cfun, restmp);
- BLOCK_VARS (DECL_INITIAL (current_function_decl))
- = restmp;
- }
+ add_local_decl (cfun, restmp);
+ BLOCK_VARS (DECL_INITIAL (current_function_decl)) = restmp;
}
- else
- restmp = create_tmp_var (restype, "retval");
}
else
restmp = create_tmp_reg (restype, "retval");
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d1916a03490
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/bitint-60.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/112941 */
+/* { dg-do compile { target bitint575 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -std=c23" } */
+
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f1 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f2 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f3 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f4 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+_BitInt(495) f5 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+_BitInt(495) f6 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { unsigned _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+_BitInt(495) f7 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+_BitInt(495) f8 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { _BitInt(539) y = x; return y; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f9 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) x; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f10 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) x; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f11 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
+unsigned _BitInt(495) f12 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
+_BitInt(495) f13 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) x; }
+_BitInt(495) f14 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (unsigned _BitInt(539)) x; }
+_BitInt(495) f15 (signed _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
+_BitInt(495) f16 (unsigned _BitInt(381) x) { return (_BitInt(539)) x; }
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list