[gcc/devel/rust/master] Make constexpr constructors type-checking more permissive
Thomas Schwinge
tschwinge@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Sep 27 15:49:48 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a24dde2e7adec97243b95c79ea7877698f17c19
commit 3a24dde2e7adec97243b95c79ea7877698f17c19
Author: Philip Herron <philip.herron@embecosm.com>
Date: Tue Sep 27 11:36:35 2022 +0100
Make constexpr constructors type-checking more permissive
Diff:
---
gcc/rust/backend/rust-constexpr.cc | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/rust/backend/rust-constexpr.cc b/gcc/rust/backend/rust-constexpr.cc
index 203449ba906..790a8e966a0 100644
--- a/gcc/rust/backend/rust-constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/rust/backend/rust-constexpr.cc
@@ -2953,14 +2953,14 @@ eval_store_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, bool lval,
TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (*valp) = TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (init);
CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (*valp) = CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING (init);
}
- else if (TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
- && !same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (TREE_TYPE (init),
- type))
- {
- /* See above on initialization of empty bases. */
- gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (init)) && !lval);
- return init;
- }
+ // else if (TREE_CODE (init) == CONSTRUCTOR
+ // && !same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (TREE_TYPE (init),
+ // type))
+ // {
+ // /* See above on initialization of empty bases. */
+ // // gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (init)) && !lval);
+ // return init;
+ // }
else
*valp = init;
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list