[gcc r13-2305] tree-optimization/65244 - include asserts in predicates for uninit
Richard Biener
rguenth@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Aug 31 11:04:05 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40f347881ade08fe9c0f8b527f8b54bd53aed195
commit r13-2305-g40f347881ade08fe9c0f8b527f8b54bd53aed195
Author: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Date: Tue Aug 30 10:31:26 2022 +0200
tree-optimization/65244 - include asserts in predicates for uninit
When uninit computes the actual predicates from the control dependence
edges it currently skips those that are assert-like (where one edge
leads to a block which ends in a noreturn call). That leads to
bogus uninit diagnostics when applied on the USE side.
PR tree-optimization/65244
* gimple-predicate-analysis.h (predicate::init_from_control_deps):
Add argument to specify whether the predicate is for the USE.
* gimple-predicate-analysis.cc (predicate::init_from_control_deps):
Also include predicates effective fallthru control edges when
the predicate is for the USE.
* gcc.dg/uninit-pr65244-2.c: New testcase.
Diff:
---
gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc | 17 +++++++++++------
gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.h | 2 +-
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr65244-2.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc
index 6b2e347536a..49500b77832 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.cc
@@ -1666,7 +1666,7 @@ predicate::normalize (gimple *use_or_def, bool is_use)
void
predicate::init_from_control_deps (const vec<edge> *dep_chains,
- unsigned num_chains)
+ unsigned num_chains, bool is_use)
{
gcc_assert (is_empty ());
@@ -1675,7 +1675,8 @@ predicate::init_from_control_deps (const vec<edge> *dep_chains,
return;
if (DEBUG_PREDICATE_ANALYZER && dump_file)
- fprintf (dump_file, "init_from_control_deps {%s}:\n",
+ fprintf (dump_file, "init_from_control_deps [%s] {%s}:\n",
+ is_use ? "USE" : "DEF",
format_edge_vecs (dep_chains, num_chains).c_str ());
/* Convert the control dependency chain into a set of predicates. */
@@ -1711,8 +1712,12 @@ predicate::init_from_control_deps (const vec<edge> *dep_chains,
if (is_gimple_call (cond_stmt) && EDGE_COUNT (e->src->succs) >= 2)
/* Ignore EH edge. Can add assertion on the other edge's flag. */
continue;
- /* Skip if there is essentially one succesor. */
- if (EDGE_COUNT (e->src->succs) == 2)
+ /* Skip this edge if it is bypassing an abort - when the
+ condition is not satisfied we are neither reaching the
+ definition nor the use so it isn't meaningful. Note if
+ we are processing the use predicate the condition is
+ meaningful. See PR65244. */
+ if (!is_use && EDGE_COUNT (e->src->succs) == 2)
{
edge e1;
edge_iterator ei1;
@@ -1941,7 +1946,7 @@ uninit_analysis::init_use_preds (predicate &use_preds, basic_block def_bb,
condition under which the definition in DEF_BB is used in USE_BB.
Each OR subexpression is represented by one element of DEP_CHAINS,
where each element consists of a series of AND subexpressions. */
- use_preds.init_from_control_deps (dep_chains, num_chains);
+ use_preds.init_from_control_deps (dep_chains, num_chains, true);
return !use_preds.is_empty ();
}
@@ -2050,7 +2055,7 @@ uninit_analysis::init_from_phi_def (gphi *phi)
/* Convert control dependence chains to the predicate in *THIS under
which the PHI operands are defined to values for which M_EVAL is
false. */
- m_phi_def_preds.init_from_control_deps (dep_chains, num_chains);
+ m_phi_def_preds.init_from_control_deps (dep_chains, num_chains, false);
return !m_phi_def_preds.is_empty ();
}
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.h b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.h
index 48da8f70efd..bc0248d7a93 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.h
+++ b/gcc/gimple-predicate-analysis.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ class predicate
return m_preds;
}
- void init_from_control_deps (const vec<edge> *, unsigned);
+ void init_from_control_deps (const vec<edge> *, unsigned, bool);
void dump (gimple *, const char *) const;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr65244-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr65244-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a28893cdcb5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/uninit-pr65244-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Og -Wuninitialized -ftree-bit-ccp -fno-thread-jumps -fdump-tree-uninit2" } */
+
+void exit(int __status) __attribute__ ((__noreturn__));
+int posix_memalign(void **__memptr, __SIZE_TYPE__ __alignment,
+ __SIZE_TYPE__ __size);
+
+void *f(void)
+{
+ void *ptr;
+
+ if (posix_memalign(&ptr, 16, 256) != 0)
+ exit(1);
+
+ return ptr; /* { dg-bogus "uninitialized" } */
+}
+
+/* Make sure the uninit pass has something to do, add to the set of
+ disabled optimizations if not. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "# ptr_. = PHI" "uninit2" } } */
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list