[gcc r11-9945] c++: partial ordering with dependent NTTP type [PR105289]
Patrick Palka
ppalka@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Apr 28 15:39:28 GMT 2022
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
commit r11-9945-gc4332c785c8e993104a4d76d86c737b51a636aee
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Apr 25 21:46:56 2022 -0400
c++: partial ordering with dependent NTTP type [PR105289]
Here ever since r11-6483-ge2e2f3f2c9400f we're rejecting and crashing
on (respectively) two testcases that we used to accept in C++17 mode
since r8-1437-g3da557ec145823. Both testcases declare a partial
specialization of a primary template that has an NTTP with dependent
type, and the validity of these partial specializations is unclear and
the subject of PR86193 / CWG 455.
So for now, this minimal patch just aims to fix the crash in the second
testcase. During deduction, when checking whether the type of an NTTP
uses still-undeduced parameters, we were incorrectly substituting into
the previously substituted type instead of into its original type.
In passing this patch also downgrades the "not more specialized"
diagnostic from a permerror to a pedwarn.
PR c++/105289
PR c++/86193
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.c (process_partial_specialization): Downgrade "partial
specialization isn't more specialized" diagnostic from permerror
to an on-by-default pedwarn.
(unify) <case TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX>: When substituting into the
NTTP type a second time, use the original type not the
substituted type.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C: New test.
* g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 288e4c64f6b4806358aabc9b99b2fba72bf04bf6)
Diff:
---
gcc/cp/pt.c | 7 ++++---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C | 11 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index 92b2ab412d3..c98acbec481 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -5200,8 +5200,9 @@ process_partial_specialization (tree decl)
&& !get_partial_spec_bindings (maintmpl, maintmpl, specargs))
{
auto_diagnostic_group d;
- if (permerror (input_location, "partial specialization %qD is not "
- "more specialized than", decl))
+ if (pedwarn (input_location, 0,
+ "partial specialization %qD is not more specialized than",
+ decl))
inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (maintmpl), "primary template %qD",
maintmpl);
}
@@ -23928,7 +23929,7 @@ unify (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg, int strict,
/* Now check whether the type of this parameter is still
dependent, and give up if so. */
++processing_template_decl;
- tparm = tsubst (tparm, targs, tf_none, NULL_TREE);
+ tparm = tsubst (TREE_TYPE (parm), targs, tf_none, NULL_TREE);
--processing_template_decl;
if (uses_template_parms (tparm))
return unify_success (explain_p);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..556224a3104
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+// PR c++/86193
+// CWG 455 (active)
+// { dg-options "" } // clear -pedantic-errors
+
+template<class T> struct value_type;
+
+template<class T, typename value_type<T>::type V>
+struct A;
+
+template<class T, int V>
+struct A<T*, V> { }; // { dg-warning "not more specialized" }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5f51e8a27de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// PR c++/105289
+// CWG 455 (active)
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template<class T>
+struct value_type;
+
+template<class List, typename value_type<List>::type Element>
+struct push_front_vlist;
+
+template<template<class X, X...> class XList, class T, T Arg, T... Vs>
+struct push_front_vlist<XList<T, Vs...>, Arg> { }; // { dg-error "not more specialized" }
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list