[gcc r12-1795] Correctly unify recomputation with existing range.
Andrew Macleod
amacleod@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Jun 24 17:34:06 GMT 2021
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5bdcfb74ff97b42f08993af8614c35685fdd8689
commit r12-1795-g5bdcfb74ff97b42f08993af8614c35685fdd8689
Author: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Date: Wed Jun 23 15:25:45 2021 -0400
Correctly unify recomputation with existing range.
When propagating the on-entry cache, new block ranges are calculated
by combining all the incoming edges and comparing to the old value.
When a recomputation was performed on an edge, it didn't take into account
that the value in the block may already be better than a potential
recompuation... Thus a worse values was sometimes propagated.
Fixed by simply calling the now correct range_on_edge the cache provides.
* gimple-range-cache.cc (ranger_cache::propagate_cache): Call
range_on_edge instead of manually calculating.
Diff:
---
gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc | 29 +++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
index a377261c5c7..98ecdbbd68e 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
+++ b/gcc/gimple-range-cache.cc
@@ -1037,27 +1037,12 @@ ranger_cache::propagate_cache (tree name)
new_range.set_undefined ();
FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
{
+ range_on_edge (e_range, e, name);
if (DEBUG_RANGE_CACHE)
- fprintf (dump_file, " edge %d->%d :", e->src->index, bb->index);
- // Get whatever range we can for this edge.
- if (!m_gori.outgoing_edge_range_p (e_range, e, name, *this))
{
- exit_range (e_range, name, e->src);
- if (DEBUG_RANGE_CACHE)
- {
- fprintf (dump_file, "No outgoing edge range, picked up ");
- e_range.dump (dump_file);
- fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
- }
- }
- else
- {
- if (DEBUG_RANGE_CACHE)
- {
- fprintf (dump_file, "outgoing range :");
- e_range.dump (dump_file);
- fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
- }
+ fprintf (dump_file, " edge %d->%d :", e->src->index, bb->index);
+ e_range.dump (dump_file);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
}
new_range.union_ (e_range);
if (new_range.varying_p ())
@@ -1074,7 +1059,11 @@ ranger_cache::propagate_cache (tree name)
if (DEBUG_RANGE_CACHE)
{
if (!ok_p)
- fprintf (dump_file, " Cache failure to store value.");
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Cache failure to store value:");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, name, TDF_SLIM);
+ fprintf (dump_file, " ");
+ }
else
{
fprintf (dump_file, " Updating range to ");
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list