[gcc(refs/users/guojiufu/heads/personal-branch)] [Ada] ICE during unnesting when nested subprograms have address taken
Jiu Fu Guo
guojiufu@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jun 10 03:25:18 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7f696a040a0fd85ea58399836a77f903d6bf039
commit d7f696a040a0fd85ea58399836a77f903d6bf039
Author: Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com>
Date: Thu Dec 19 17:00:27 2019 -0500
[Ada] ICE during unnesting when nested subprograms have address taken
2020-06-02 Gary Dismukes <dismukes@adacore.com>
gcc/ada/
* exp_unst.adb (Register_Subprogram): Test for Address_Taken (in
addition to the existing test for In_Synchonized_Unit) when
deciding whether to reset the Reachable flag on all subprograms
enclosing the subprogram being registered.
Diff:
---
gcc/ada/exp_unst.adb | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_unst.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_unst.adb
index 1460b641b19..b3ded138ee5 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_unst.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_unst.adb
@@ -841,9 +841,13 @@ package body Exp_Unst is
-- If we marked this reachable because it's in a synchronized
-- unit, we have to mark all enclosing subprograms as reachable
- -- as well.
+ -- as well. We do the same for subprograms with Address_Taken,
+ -- because otherwise we can run into problems with looking at
+ -- enclosing subprograms in Subps.Table due to their being
+ -- unreachable (the Subp_Index of unreachable subps is later
+ -- set to zero and their entry in Subps.Table is removed).
- if In_Synchronized_Unit (E) then
+ if In_Synchronized_Unit (E) or else Address_Taken (E) then
declare
S : Entity_Id := E;
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list