[gcc r11-2135] [Ada] Cleanup in Convert_To_Positional after previous work
Pierre-Marie de Rodat
pmderodat@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jul 15 13:47:27 GMT 2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2ba82add6af32344b056b272ca1c31b60b8f903
commit r11-2135-gc2ba82add6af32344b056b272ca1c31b60b8f903
Author: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Date: Fri Jun 5 11:35:25 2020 +0200
[Ada] Cleanup in Convert_To_Positional after previous work
gcc/ada/
* exp_aggr.adb (Flatten): Adjust description.
(Convert_To_Positional): Remove obsolete ??? comment and use
Compile_Time_Known_Value in the final test.
Diff:
---
gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb | 18 +++---------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
index 6d8919127d9..29d3f149095 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_aggr.adb
@@ -4969,9 +4969,8 @@ package body Exp_Aggr is
Dims : Nat;
Ix : Node_Id;
Ixb : Node_Id) return Boolean;
- -- Convert the aggregate into a purely positional form if possible. On
- -- entry the bounds of all dimensions are known to be static, and the
- -- total number of components is safe enough to expand.
+ -- Convert the aggregate into a purely positional form if possible after
+ -- checking that the bounds of all dimensions are known to be static.
function Is_Flat (N : Node_Id; Dims : Nat) return Boolean;
-- Return True if the aggregate N is flat (which is not trivial in the
@@ -5476,10 +5475,6 @@ package body Exp_Aggr is
-- compatible with the upper bound of the type, and therefore it is
-- worth flattening such aggregates as well.
- -- For now the back-end expands these aggregates into individual
- -- assignments to the target anyway, but it is conceivable that
- -- it will eventually be able to treat such aggregates statically???
-
if Aggr_Size_OK (N, Typ)
and then
Flatten (N, Dims, First_Index (Typ), First_Index (Base_Type (Typ)))
@@ -5506,14 +5501,7 @@ package body Exp_Aggr is
if Nkind (N) = N_Aggregate and then Present (Expressions (N)) then
Expr := First (Expressions (N));
while Present (Expr) loop
- if Nkind_In (Expr, N_Integer_Literal, N_Real_Literal)
- or else
- (Is_Entity_Name (Expr)
- and then Ekind (Entity (Expr)) = E_Enumeration_Literal)
- then
- null;
-
- else
+ if not Compile_Time_Known_Value (Expr) then
Error_Msg_N
("non-static object requires elaboration code??", N);
exit;
More information about the Gcc-cvs
mailing list