[Bug libfortran/93727] Fortran 2018: EX edit descriptor

[jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93727

--- Comment #40 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #39)
--- snip ---
> > I have added a new testcase called EXrounding.F90 to do this. I have style
> > checks done as well. As soon as I go through a clean pull and fresh
> > regression tests, I will push. Thanks Harald.
> 
> Please do not forget to inform the list!
> 
> BTW: I see testsuite failures on Power.  Not sure if related, but I see
> also warnings compiling libgfortran/io/write.c:
> 
> In file included from ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/write.c:53:
> ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/write_float.def: In Funktion
> »get_float_hex_string«:
> ../../../gcc-trunk/libgfortran/io/write_float.def:177:57: warning: Format
> »%llX« erwartet Argumenttyp »long long unsigned int«, aber Argument 5 hat
> Typ »long unsigned int« [-Wformat=]
>   177 |           result = snprintf (buffer, 25, "-0X%X.%13.13llXP%+d",
> int_part,
>       |                                                 ~~~~~~~~^
>       |                                                         |
>       |                                                         long long
> unsigned int
>       |                                                 %13.13lX
>   178 |                              (GFC_UINTEGER_8) frac_part, expon);
>       |                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
>       |                              |
>       |                              long unsigned int
> 
> I think the warnings are correct, and wonder whether one should use/pass
> (long long unsigned) instead of (GFC_UINTEGER_8).

That warning bothers me too. I am just finishing regression tests here.  I will
submit to the lists before I commit. See if the auto testers catch anything.
Let me know if you see specific testsuite failres on power.