[Bug target/124336] different (noop) memory access size generated for -masm=intel/att with -fstack-check

[zsojka at seznam dot cz]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124336

--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> ---
I think, from the performance point of view, generally the size of the memory
access should be the same as other accesses to the same memory location
[rsp+0], in order to allow store-to-load forwarding. (if there are such
accesses)