[Bug libstdc++/123406] [16 Regression] 27_io/print/1.cc 27_io/print/2.cc 27_io/print/3.cc on newlib targets since r16-4350

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123406

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #0)
> Another look at current newlib sources shows that among those systems, only
> cygwin implements the declared-but-missing functions.  So, it seems safe to
> assume for now, that no other newlib target actually implements them, and
> that it'd be valid to hardcode a "no" for non-cygwin newlib targets. 

Ah OK, that shouldn't be too hard to fix then.

> Though, a patch should preferably leave room for a manually added exception
> list, should such a target appear.

Agreed.