[Bug c++/122318] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE on CTAD for alias template with lambda

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122318

--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka <ppalka@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fe46ba8eb3f2cf41744cf8490b025f0876b9c86

commit r16-7554-g9fe46ba8eb3f2cf41744cf8490b025f0876b9c86
Author: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 17 11:21:42 2026 -0500

    c++: unifying LAMBDA_EXPR [PR122318]

    This patch makes the default case of unify accept LAMBDA_EXPR P/A pairs,
    which we can legitimately hit during alias CTAD guide overload resolution.
    We can also less legimitately hit this during partial specialization
    matching (likely IFNDR).

    I'm not totally sure if we want to handle them like any other non-deducible
    expression vs handling them separately (returning success iff they're ==).
    I couldn't come up with a testcase for which it mattered so I went the
    simpler route.

            PR c++/122318
            PR c++/101670

    gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

            * pt.cc (unify) <default>: Accept LAMBDA_EXPR.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-targ20.C: New test.
            * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-targ21.C: New test.

    Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>