[Bug libstdc++/119721] tuple<> cannot be compared with array<T, 0>
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Oct 29 16:12:18 GMT 2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119721
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tomasz Kaminski <tkaminsk@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:52e300124d2eaad0f19ccc0a49f95fd605a1de69
commit r16-4710-g52e300124d2eaad0f19ccc0a49f95fd605a1de69
Author: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 25 20:25:42 2025 +0300
libstdc++: Add constructors and assignments for tuple<> with tuple-like
types [PR119721]
This patch adds support for constructing and assigning tuple<> from
other empty tuple-like types (e.g., array<T, 0>), completing the C++23
tuple-like interface for the zero-element tuple specialization.
The implementation includes:
- Constructor from forwarding reference to tuple-like types
- Allocator-aware constructor from tuple-like types
- Assignment operator from tuple-like types
- Const assignment operator from tuple-like types
PR libstdc++/119721
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/tuple (tuple<>::tuple(const tuple&))
(tuple<>::operator=(const tuple&)): Define as defaulted.
(tuple<>::swap): Moved the defintion after assignments.
(tuple<>::tuple(_UTuple&&))
(tuple<>::tuple(allocator_arg_t, const _Alloc&, _UTuple&&))
(tuple<>::operator=(_UTuple&&)) [__cpp_lib_tuple_like]: Define.
(tuple<>::operator==, tuple<>::opeator<=>): Parenthesize
constrains individually.
* testsuite/23_containers/tuple/cons/119721.cc: New test for
constructors and assignments with empty tuple-like types.
* testsuite/20_util/tuple/requirements/empty_trivial.cc:
New test verifying tuple<> remains trivially copyable.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Tomasz KamiÅski <tkaminsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Osama Abdelkader <osama.abdelkader@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomasz KamiÅski <tkaminsk@redhat.com>
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list