[Bug middle-end/122605] [16 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr105951-[12].c ICEs
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Nov 10 18:25:55 GMT 2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122605
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c180ad35fb695ee4797bf9c5cb8a292c7af6b358
commit r16-5136-gc180ad35fb695ee4797bf9c5cb8a292c7af6b358
Author: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri Nov 7 21:08:42 2025 -0800
builtins: Fix atomics expansion after build_call_nary change [PR122605]
So before r16-5089-gc66ebc3e22138, we could call build_call_nary with more
arguments than was passed as the nargs. Afterwards we get an assert if
there
were not exactly that amount.
In this case the code is easier to read when passing the correct number of
args
in the first place.
This fixes the two places in builtins.cc where this pattern shows up.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu (and tested the testcase with
-m32 where
the failure showed up).
PR middle-end/122605
gcc/ChangeLog:
* builtins.cc (expand_ifn_atomic_bit_test_and): Split out the call
to
build_call_nary into two different statements.
(expand_ifn_atomic_op_fetch_cmp_0): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <andrew.pinski@oss.qualcomm.com>
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list