[Bug ipa/119484] [14/15 Regression] v2: tail call vs IPA-VRP return value range with constant value
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 28 09:50:18 GMT 2025
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119484
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c95f5a0c0719ad5b23f605b4d8f8dd3689a0066b
commit r15-9002-gc95f5a0c0719ad5b23f605b4d8f8dd3689a0066b
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Mar 28 10:48:31 2025 +0100
ipa-sra: Don't change return type to void if there are musttail calls
[PR119484]
The following testcase is rejected, because IPA-SRA decides to
turn bar.constprop call into bar.constprop.isra which returns void.
While there is no explicit lhs on the call, as it is a musttail call
the tailc pass checks if IPA-VRP returns singleton from that function
and the function returns the same value and in that case it still turns
it into a tail call. This can't work with IPA-SRA changing it into
void returning function though.
The following patch fixes this by forcing returning the original type
if there are musttail calls.
2025-03-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR ipa/119484
* ipa-sra.cc (isra_analyze_call): Don't set m_return_ignored if
gimple_call_must_tail_p even if it doesn't have lhs.
* c-c++-common/pr119484.c: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list