[Bug tree-optimization/114912] [15 regression] SIGBUS in wi::copy<> on SPARC since r15-88-gc60b3e211c5557 since char array is not aligned to what it needs to be

[aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114912

Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #19 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #18)
> > --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> > (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #14)
> >> > --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> >> > BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy
> >> > person here:
> >> >
> >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650634.html
> >> 
> >> I can give the patch a whirl, thanks.
> >
> > I've attached a rebased patch against current mainline.  Let me know if it
> > works on your end, and I'll commit.
> 
> I've included both this patch ...
> 
> >> I had Andrew's patch in my tree to avoid the issue.  Unfortunately,
> >> Solaris/SPARC bootstrap is broken again due to PR ipa/114985.
> >
> > I have provided a patch for that PR as well, but the IPA folk need to say if
> > this is the correct approach.
> 
> ... and that one in last night's SPARC bootstraps, which worked just
> fine again.  Thanks.

Thanks for testing.  I'll close this PR as fixed in mainline then.  FWIW, I
also retested on x86-64 Linux.