[Bug middle-end/111151] [12/13 Regression] Wrong code at -O0 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111151

--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e

commit r14-9676-gf536ea9cc3226793dc156952340f21e55b60c04e
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Mar 26 16:40:53 2024 +0100

    testsuite: Fix up pr111151.c testcase [PR114486]

    Apparently I've somehow screwed up the adjustments of the originally tested
    testcase, tweaked it so that in the second/third cases it actually see
    a MAX_EXPR rather than COND_EXPR the MAX_EXPR has been optimized into,
    and didn't update the expected value.

    2024-03-26  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR middle-end/111151
            PR testsuite/114486
            * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr111151.c (main): Fix up expected value
for
            f.