[Bug tree-optimization/116034] [12/13 Regression] wrong code with memcpy() from _Complex unsigned short at -fno-strict-aliasing -O1 and above

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116034

--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:181f40f5cf8510a16191e4768dadbe2cb7a5c095

commit r14-10507-g181f40f5cf8510a16191e4768dadbe2cb7a5c095
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 24 18:00:05 2024 +0200

    testsuite: Fix up pr116034.c test for big/pdp endian [PR116061]

    Didn't notice the memmove is into an int variable, so the test
    was still failing on big endian.

    2024-07-24  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/116034
            PR testsuite/116061
            * gcc.dg/pr116034.c (g): Change type from int to unsigned short.
            (foo): Guard memmove call on __SIZEOF_SHORT__ == 2.

    (cherry picked from commit 69e69847e21a8d951ab5f09fd3421449564dba31)