[Bug tree-optimization/115721] expand_complex_comparison has handling of GIMPLE_RETURN but a comparison can't be in a return
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Jul 10 05:22:52 GMT 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115721
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f8bddb58ad7746b2a19c43e32641d161fa15caf
commit r15-1933-g8f8bddb58ad7746b2a19c43e32641d161fa15caf
Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue Jul 9 14:00:34 2024 -0700
Remove expanding complex EQ/NE inside a GIMPLE_RETURN [PR115721]
This code has been dead at least since the move over to tuples
in 0-88576-g726a989a8b74bf, when gimple returns could only have
a simple expression in it. So let's remove it.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/115721
* tree-complex.cc (expand_complex_comparison): Remove
support for GIMPLE_RETURN.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list