[Bug tree-optimization/109565] -Wstrict-overflow false positive

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109565

Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I personally think it would be worthwhile to split out the pointer-related
instances of -Wstrict-overflow into a separate flag (-Wstrict-pointer-overflow,
perhaps), that can be toggled separately. In this case the user just wants to
know about overflow on integers, but not pointers, but I can see of cases where
a user might want the reverse (i.e., to know about overflow on pointers, but
not on integers)