[Bug tree-optimization/112637] Bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Nov 21 00:40:54 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112637
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-21
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>and any level of optimization enabled,
No, it just at -O1, -Os and -Og. At -O2 and -O3 we are able to optimize the
first load of w.first out and end up with no uninitialized variable warning.
Basically it comes down to this:
```
QBenchmarkIterationController::QBenchmarkIterationController (&w.controller);
w.first = 1;
goto <bb 4>; [100.00%]
....
<bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]:
# result_4 = PHI <result_8(D)(2), result_13(3)>
_18 = w.first;
if (_18 != 0)
goto <bb 7>; [67.00%]
else
goto <bb 5>; [33.00%]
```
not being optimized ... I am not so sure if this is fixable, especially at -Og.
-Os might be. -O1 is in a similar situtation as -Os though. compile speed vs
runtime speed ...
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list