[Bug libfortran/110966] should matmul_c8_avx512f be updated with matmul_c8_x86-64-v4.
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Nov 13 20:50:02 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110966
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2023-11-13
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> > > > I think matmul is fine with avx512f or avx, so requiring/using only the base
> > > > ISA level sounds fine to me.
> > >
> > > Could be potential miss-optimization.
> >
> > Do you mean a missed optimzation?
> >
> > Or really wrong code?
>
> a missed optimzation.
Are there benchmarks which show that the code would indeed run
faster?
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list