[Bug c++/95860] Wrong "looser exception specification" when a class has 2 prospective destructors.
ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon May 8 19:53:09 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95860
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks| |67491
--- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The error message doesn't make much sense here, but is this example strictly
speaking valid given that virtual functions can't be constrained
([class.virtual]/6)?
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
[Bug 67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list