[Bug target/109257] `-masm=intel` generates weird syntax for indirect jumps

[lh_mouse at 126 dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109257

--- Comment #5 from LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> ---
(In reply to jbeulich from comment #4)
> Being as compatible as possible with MASM has been the primary goal of
> supporting Intel syntax. Intel's SDM doesn't specify complete assembly
> language; it serves as a reference where possible/sensible.

GAS may accept it at any cost but GCC should not generate it. This is an issue
about GCC, not GAS.