[Bug testsuite/110419] [14 regression] new test case gfortran.dg/value_9.f90 in r14-2050-gd130ae8499e0c6 fails
mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Jul 30 19:50:14 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110419
--- Comment #17 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Created attachment 55660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55660&action=edit
Update function type patch
This patch changes the dummy argument declaration type.
It changes the dump as follows.
--- m32/pr110419_comment4.f90.005t.original 2023-07-05 13:05:58.743843174
+0000
+++ pr110419_comment4.f90.005t.original 2023-07-30 19:31:20.880043687 +0000
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
__attribute__((fn spec (". r w ")))
-void val (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict x, character(kind=1)[1:1] c,
integer(kind=4) _x, integer(kind=4) _c)
+void val (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict x, character(kind=1) c,
integer(kind=4) _x, integer(kind=4) _c)
{
{
struct __st_parameter_dt dt_parm.0;
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
_gfortran_transfer_character_write (&dt_parm.1, &c, 1);
_gfortran_st_write_done (&dt_parm.1);
}
- if (c[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} != (*x)[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1})
+ if ((*x)[1]{lb: 1 sz: 1} != c)
{
_gfortran_stop_numeric (1, 0);
}
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
__attribute__((fn spec (". ")))
void p ()
{
- static void val (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict, character(kind=1)[1:1],
integer(kind=4), integer(kind=4));
+ static void val (character(kind=1)[1:1] & restrict, character(kind=1),
integer(kind=4), integer(kind=4));
static integer(kind=4) a = 65;
{
It seems to fix comment #4 (both 32 and 64 bits).
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list