[Bug target/110170] Sub-optimal conditional jumps in conditional-swap with floating point
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Jul 6 05:54:38 GMT 2023
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110170
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu <liuhongt@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e
commit r14-2337-g37a231cc7594d12ba0822077018aad751a6fb94e
Author: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>
Date: Wed Jul 5 13:45:11 2023 +0800
Disparage slightly for the alternative which move DFmode between SSE_REGS
and GENERAL_REGS.
For testcase
void __cond_swap(double* __x, double* __y) {
bool __r = (*__x < *__y);
auto __tmp = __r ? *__x : *__y;
*__y = __r ? *__y : *__x;
*__x = __tmp;
}
GCC-14 with -O2 and -march=x86-64 options generates the following code:
__cond_swap(double*, double*):
movsd xmm1, QWORD PTR [rdi]
movsd xmm0, QWORD PTR [rsi]
comisd xmm0, xmm1
jbe .L2
movq rax, xmm1
movapd xmm1, xmm0
movq xmm0, rax
.L2:
movsd QWORD PTR [rsi], xmm1
movsd QWORD PTR [rdi], xmm0
ret
rax is used to save and restore DFmode value. In RA both GENERAL_REGS
and SSE_REGS cost zero since we didn't disparage the
alternative in movdf_internal pattern, according to register
allocation order, GENERAL_REGS is allocated. The patch add ? for
alternative (r,v) and (v,r) just like we did for movsf/hf/bf_internal
pattern, after that we get optimal RA.
__cond_swap:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
movsd (%rdi), %xmm1
movsd (%rsi), %xmm0
comisd %xmm1, %xmm0
jbe .L2
movapd %xmm1, %xmm2
movapd %xmm0, %xmm1
movapd %xmm2, %xmm0
.L2:
movsd %xmm1, (%rsi)
movsd %xmm0, (%rdi)
ret
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/110170
* config/i386/i386.md (movdf_internal): Disparage slightly for
2 alternatives (r,v) and (v,r) by adding constraint modifier
'?'.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/i386/pr110170-3.c: New test.
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list