[Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181

[linkw at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415

--- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin <linkw at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #3)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2)
> > The contradictory thing is that we can have TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT
> > (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) together with the proposed option combination. :)
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean with this comment, but just to be clear, we
> should not allow TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SFT_FLOAT (!TARGET_HARD_FLOAT) at the
> same time.

Sorry for the confusion and thanks for clarifying, I meant the similar meaning
that: the given option combination, like

  -mmodulo -mcpu=401 or -mcpu=401 -mpower9-vector or ...

makes us to have both TARGET_VSX and TARGET_SOFT_FLOAT at the same time, it's
contradictory (shouldn't be allowed as you noted).